Desperate posting on Craigs List
Thu 8 Nov 2007 - Filed under: Uncategorized — Boy Blue
Comments (0)

What am I doing wrong?

Okay, I’m tired of beating around the bush. I’m a beautiful
(spectacularly beautiful) 25 year old girl. I’m articulate and classy.
I’m not from New York. I’m looking to get married to a guy who makes at
least half a million a year. I know how that sounds, but keep in mind
that a million a year is middle class in New York City, so I don’t think
I’m overreaching at all.

Are there any guys who make 500K or more on this board? Any wives? Could
you send me some tips? I dated a business man who makes average around
200 - 250. But that’s where I seem to hit a roadblock. 250,000 won’t get
me to central park west. I know a woman in my yoga class who was married
to an investment banker and lives in Tribeca, and she’s not as pretty as
I am, nor is she a great genius. So what is she doing right? How do I
get to her level?

Here are my questions specifically:

- Where do you single rich men hang out? Give me specifics- bars,
restaurants, gyms

-What are you looking for in a mate? Be honest guys, you won’t hurt my
feelings

-Is there an age range I should be targeting (I’m 25)?

- Why are some of the women living lavish lifestyles on the upper east
side so plain? I’ve seen really ‘plain jane’ boring types who have
nothing to offer married to incredibly wealthy guys. I’ve seen drop dead
gorgeous girls in singles bars in the east village. What’s the story
there?

- Jobs I should look out for? Everyone knows - lawyer, investment
banker, doctor. How much do those guys really make? And where do they
hang out? Where do the hedge fund guys hang out?

- How you decide marriage vs. just a girlfriend? I am looking for
MARRIAGE ONLY

Please hold your insults - I’m putting myself out there in an honest
way. Most beautiful women are superficial; at least I’m being up front
about it. I wouldn’t be searching for these kind of guys if I wasn’t
able to match them - in looks, culture, sophistication, and keeping a
nice home and hearth.

it’s NOT ok to contact this poster with services or other commercial
interests
PostingID: 432279810

THE ANSWER
Dear Pers-431649184:

I read your posting with great interest and have thought meaningfully
about your dilemma. I offer the following analysis of your predicament.
Firstly, I’m not wasting your time, I qualify as a guy who fits your
bill; that is I make more than $500K per year. That said here’s how I
see it.

Your offer, from the prospective of a guy like me, is plain and simple a
crappy business deal. Here’s why. Cutting through all the B.S., what you
suggest is a simple trade: you bring your looks to the party and I bring
my money. Fine, simple. But here’s the rub, your looks will fade and my
money will likely continue into perpetuity…in fact, it is very likely
that my income increases but it is an absolute certainty that you won’t
be getting any more beautiful!

So, in economic terms you are a depreciating asset and I am an earning
asset. Not only are you a depreciating asset, your depreciation
accelerates! Let me explain, you’re 25 now and will likely stay pretty
hot for the next 5 years, but less so each year. Then the fade begins in
earnest. By 35 stick a fork in you!

So in Wall Street terms, we would call you a trading position, not a buy
and hold…hence the rub…marriage. It doesn’t make good business sense
to “buy you” (which is what you’re asking) so I’d rather lease. In case
you think I’m being cruel, I would say the following. If my money were
to go away, so would you, so when your beauty fades I need an out. It’s
as simple as that. So a deal that makes sense is dating, not marriage.

Separately, I was taught early in my career about efficient markets. So,
I wonder why a girl as “articulate, classy and spectacularly beautiful”
as you has been unable to find your sugar daddy. I find it hard to
believe that if you are as gorgeous as you say you are that the $500K
hasn’t found you, if not only for a tryout.

By the way, you could always find a way to make your own money and then
we wouldn’t need to have this difficult conversation.

With all that said, I must say you’re going about it the right way.
Classic “pump and dump.”
I hope this is helpful, and if you want to enter into some sort of
lease, let me know.

Vagina v. Clitoris: A History
Tue 11 Sep 2007 - Filed under: Uncategorized — Boy Blue
Comments (0)

A woman’s clitoris has eighteen parts, all of which play a role in her sexual pleasure. The vagina, which accepts the penis, is only a part of the vast inner workings of the woman’s sexual satisfaction. Although this is not common knowledge, the respect for the sexual potential of a woman has increased dramatically since the 1950’s. Many men now know that their own stamina comes nowhere near that of women and must find other methods, such as cunnilingus (the use of the tongue on the clitoris to stimulate an orgasm), to satisfy their lover. However, in the fifties, the idea that a woman could not be satisfied by the male’s penis was blasphemy against his masculinity.

In the 50’s, knowledge of the female’s “lower regions” was scarce, but the desire to find that knowledge was almost unheard of because of Sigmund Freud. Almost all theories about the female’s sexual organs came from his outdated (almost forty years) and biased proclamations that a woman who could not be satisfied by the penis of her lover “must have something wrong with her” (2). He publicized the idea that clitoral orgasms were merely the “launching pad for the more ‘mature’ vaginal orgasm” (2). His ideas reinforced the penetrative and reproductive model, and because of them, doctors and psychologists gradually overlooked the vagina “until it became an anatomical nonentity” (1). Since it was of no scientific importance, the common couple based their sexual experiences on what was widely approved: sex for reproduction, not pleasure.

Read the rest of the article here.

Social Porn Bookmarking
Mon 10 Sep 2007 - Filed under: Uncategorized — Boy Blue
Comments (0)

So the web has upgraded on a user savvy sense and everything is 2.0 this and that now. Of course porn is one of the first industries to follow the lead with trendy websites that enable social bookmarking and sharing of links. My favorite place to visit when I need my porn fix is of course Booble and now they have the nifty adult bookmarking site Boobmark.Take a look at Boobmark and see if theres some links you find worthy of adding to your favorites

Porn School
Tue 21 Aug 2007 - Filed under: Uncategorized — Boy Blue
Comments (0)

There’s a problem with porn in the Litchfield Elementary School District. It stems from a Web site address that’s similiar to the school district’s.

Parents say just a couple of wrong letters takes you to porn.

Hollie Morrow’s daughters attend school there. She tells CBS 5 she’s very disturbed.

“We have so much good going on at their school . . . This is not how we want it to look,” she says.

The school district contacted the owner of the porn site, but he says they’d have to buy him out to shut it down.

District leaders aren’t sure they can afford to.

Can someone tell me what the schools url is or sounds like???

Read the full story here.

Sexual Confusion
Fri 17 Aug 2007 - Filed under: Uncategorized — Boy Blue
Comments (0)

District officials plan to fire three corrections officers who failed to realize a woman was being held in the male detention unit at the D.C. jail last month even after she had been strip-searched and allowed to shower with male inmates, government sources said yesterday.

It seems like even after having her fully nude there was some confusion… I really just dont get this mix up.

Read the full article here.
man/woman?